<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SEO Implications of Bing, Part I: Algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/index.php/the-seo-implications-of-bing-part-i-algorithm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/index.php/the-seo-implications-of-bing-part-i-algorithm?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-seo-implications-of-bing-part-i-algorithm</link>
	<description>Your professional source for all the latest Search Engine Marketing news and events.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apogee Search Marketing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The SEO Implications of Bing, Part II: SERPs &#124; Austin, Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/index.php/the-seo-implications-of-bing-part-i-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-226678</link>
		<dc:creator>Apogee Search Marketing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The SEO Implications of Bing, Part II: SERPs &#124; Austin, Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/?p=2593#comment-226678</guid>
		<description>[...] The SEO Implications of Bing, Part I: Algorithm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The SEO Implications of Bing, Part I: Algorithm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/index.php/the-seo-implications-of-bing-part-i-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-225299</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/?p=2593#comment-225299</guid>
		<description>Bing has made an impression it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing has made an impression it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Emerson</title>
		<link>http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/index.php/the-seo-implications-of-bing-part-i-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-225283</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/?p=2593#comment-225283</guid>
		<description>SEO is not about choosing the best search engine and optimizing for it - it&#039;s about an integrated strategy. One doesn&#039;t have to pick Google or Bing (or Yahoo, for that matter). In fact, if your site only ranks on Google, you&#039;re missing out on up to 20% of searches. Bing is big: 5-10% of market share equals 5-10% of revenue for companies relying on natural search.

That said, I disagree with the idea that Bing will never compete with Google. In my eyes, they&#039;re competing today  (especially in the fields of Travel and Shopping). To say that Bing will never overtake Google is a more reasonable statement - but it&#039;s still naive.

Think about the David and Goliath stories in the tech industry that we&#039;ve seen in the past decade: Apple vs. Microsoft, Google vs. Yahoo. Slowly but surely, with minor improvements and major marketing campaigns, Apple and Google stole market share from their much larger competitors. Considering the accelerated adoption curve of technology and the fact that there are no costs involved for the consumer in making a switch from one engine to another, Bing vs. Google is poised to be the next David vs. Goliath.

Bing hasn&#039;t done everything right. For example, a full-blown traditional media campaign was probably not the best use of ad spend for this product. But if Bing can continue to improve its vertical-based search algorithm, they stand to become the first choice for users looking for information within those verticals. Next time I plan a trip, my research sure won&#039;t start at Google or Yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO is not about choosing the best search engine and optimizing for it &#8211; it&#8217;s about an integrated strategy. One doesn&#8217;t have to pick Google or Bing (or Yahoo, for that matter). In fact, if your site only ranks on Google, you&#8217;re missing out on up to 20% of searches. Bing is big: 5-10% of market share equals 5-10% of revenue for companies relying on natural search.</p>
<p>That said, I disagree with the idea that Bing will never compete with Google. In my eyes, they&#8217;re competing today  (especially in the fields of Travel and Shopping). To say that Bing will never overtake Google is a more reasonable statement &#8211; but it&#8217;s still naive.</p>
<p>Think about the David and Goliath stories in the tech industry that we&#8217;ve seen in the past decade: Apple vs. Microsoft, Google vs. Yahoo. Slowly but surely, with minor improvements and major marketing campaigns, Apple and Google stole market share from their much larger competitors. Considering the accelerated adoption curve of technology and the fact that there are no costs involved for the consumer in making a switch from one engine to another, Bing vs. Google is poised to be the next David vs. Goliath.</p>
<p>Bing hasn&#8217;t done everything right. For example, a full-blown traditional media campaign was probably not the best use of ad spend for this product. But if Bing can continue to improve its vertical-based search algorithm, they stand to become the first choice for users looking for information within those verticals. Next time I plan a trip, my research sure won&#8217;t start at Google or Yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Company London</title>
		<link>http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/index.php/the-seo-implications-of-bing-part-i-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-225111</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Company London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apogee-search.com/Blog/?p=2593#comment-225111</guid>
		<description>Bing will never compete with Google and most seo companies know this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing will never compete with Google and most seo companies know this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
